- 1月 3, 2014
- 投稿者: 外国為替ウィキチーム
- カテゴリー: エキスパートアドバイザー
名前: |
|
||
著者: | 自分 (2011.05.23 10:06) | ||
評価: | 5.5 | ||
ダウンロード済み: | 3882 | ||
ダウンロード: |
|
||
This uses some common technical indicators. Run this as 長さ の上 EURUSD M15 から 01/16/2011 till whenever you download it.
100% 約で収益性の高い取引 100% 利益.少数の取引が予想される. Hence dont expect a trade right away. Maybe it wont trade for months.. But when it does it tends to make profit Start testing with 1000USD for better results. |
|||
tg2007:
WHRoeder:
WHat do you mean by incompatible? Will you be kind enough to use polite language and explain further? IT is supposed to run entirely automatically. And on demo testing does end up ok If not adjustable, then make it adjustable. I suppose that aint that hard for you.
Have you run this on demo testing as suggested?
As so many people on this forum seem to have forgotten what a forum means (a meeting place to discuss strategy and also to LEARN), I will explain some of what WHRoeder is taking as obvious (it only becomes naturally obvious when you complete the thinking very, very frequently). 1. Incompatible by reasoning that OrdersTotal() list ALL trades open - not just the ones from this EA. 2. Not adjustable because some platform brokers use 5 Digit charts and others still Use 4-Digit charts. There is no factor to adjust between 4 と 5 digit platforms. 3. The statement is very misleading as everybody's setup will depend on their computer, their internet connections, and whatever else they've got going on on the PC - all factors that will change your timing for open and close on every trade. Maybe some of the 'high and mighty' folks should remember that we all start somewhere, and language differences will often become a bigger barrier to understanding than the platform itself - what I am seeing here is a shame, as intelligence is measured by patience and understanding. Anyone can quote a book - few can do so with total, and perfect, understanding of what they're saying. 21.08.2011 23:04 LimeyLad51
こんにちは. i think this is an excellent work. It needs trailing stop strategy for each pair of currencies though. I do not know how to program it. if you can, let me see the results. 21.08.2011 20:41 jordanvalley
WHRoeder:
tg2007:
WHat do you mean by incompatible? Will you be kind enough to use polite language and explain further? IT is supposed to run entirely automatically. And on demo testing does end up ok If not adjustable, then make it adjustable. I suppose that aint that hard for you.
21.08.2011 20:37 jordanvalley
haha 100% 勝つ? with what 400 ストップロス? junk.
30.07.2011 22:51 グッドボーイ
Very funny. The author particularly states that it runs on only EURUSD. May you just do not read what he wrote. Hence anyone using this will possibly not get similar result on other charts!
Well I have tested this on Alpari and also on Dukoscope... it worked on both. I guess what WHOREADER wants is a holy grail. I do not suppose the author's code is one such ehy?
But yeah if WHROEADER wants to read all the statement the author wrote, then he can easily see that 1. it runs on EURUSD 2. on 15min chart 3. this year's chart. 29.05.2011 07:24 swagatobd
tg2007:
WHat do you mean by incompatible? Will you be kind enough to use polite language and explain further? IT is supposed to run entirely automatically. And on demo testing does end up ok If not adjustable, then make it adjustable. I suppose that aint that hard for you.
28.05.2011 18:20 WHRoeder
I ran this one and got the same result as you on demo testing. ありがとう. waiting for further updates.....Good job dude!
25.05.2011 04:35 swagatobd
For those who are not interested to even try this out once on demo testing, here is what I get on demo testing this code from 2011/14th Jan till today on EURUSD 15min, Long only
25.05.2011 04:24 tg2007
WHRoeder:
WHat do you mean by incompatible? Will you be kind enough to use polite language and explain further? IT is supposed to run entirely automatically. And on demo testing does end up ok If not adjustable, then make it adjustable. I suppose that aint that hard for you.
Have you run this on demo testing as suggested?
25.05.2011 04:17 tg2007
|